Book Review
Jester (a volume of selected
poems)
by Grace Marie Grafton
Not wishing to be confined to the single window
of her own perspective, the poet finds traveling companions, sets
out, and writes poems on what she finds. Who are these companions?
They are other poets, painters and sculptors whose work inspired
most of the poems in this book, particular works being cited at
the bottom of the poem. For the most part, this is a collection
of ekphrastic poems, which are poems on works of art. The poet
points out in her Artist’s Statements, that these art works provide
the inspiration, but are not the subjects of the poems. The reader
is, in fact, discouraged by the poet, in that statement, from
seeking out the particular works referenced in the poems. So,
the poet doesn’t present a “mediated” world to us– the poems are
not mimetic or imitative poems, but stand on their own, as as
much as any other poem, which necessarily draws from the poet’s
experience.
The ekphrastic poems clearly use images from the
art works, as overlays. This creates extra richness in terms of
the “texture” of sensory experience for the reader. It also introduces
new layers of understanding and interpretation, or levels of discourse
and dialogue, that are absent in a non- ekphrastic poems, One
could also discern many streams of consciousness, in which the
poet evokes an image from her past, and projects it onto the new
tableau of the art work. This helps fashion the poem into its
own distinct works of art. The ekphrastic poem becomes a kind
of thing-in-itself, a bare scaffold, opening itself wide, toward
a future construction.
Play as in dramatic play, figures prominently into
the book.The poet presents a kind of performance art for us, speaks
as the inspired voice of the art work, and her speaking is the
poem. Indeed, this is in keeping with what she writes at the beginning,
in her Author’s Statement. The poem comes in upon her,displacing
her ordinary sensibility with something new. The buzz in her head
that the poet describes in seems to announce this change in awareness.
To be moved by a poem results in heightened sensibility, and,
in the case of perceptions of paintings or sculptures, with changes
in perception. This seems to be a natural high – an exhilaration,
exaltation, inspiration, ek-statis, out of normal place sensation
seems to occur, along with a kind of synesthesia – a blurring
of the different senses, as if the different sensory pathways
cross, which sometimes manifest as poems, for the poet. Artists
gives voice to their subjects, by momentarily negating their own
ego. Keats calls this negative capability and we could explore
similar approaches in terms of other writers and traditions, East
and West. This is a basic theme or motif through the poet’s three
volumes of collected verse that is discussed later in this article.
The Author’s Statement is helpful in approaching
the poems in Jester, given the fact that they are many image-streams
converge, from the poet’s imagination and the referenced art works.
particularly in the ekphrastic poems. In the end, the poem is
what it is – a work that greets the reader and stimulates certain
thoughts and feeling in them.
** Jester has a total of 75 poems, with
approximately a dozen being non-ekphratic poems scattered through
the book. Shall we call those poems unsigned works or unsigned
poems by the poet? Among these unsigned works, we might look for
more direct expressions of the poet’s actual thoughts and feelings,
without the overlay of imagery from works by other artists. Yet,
these poems are hard to classify, and it’s hard to generalize
about comparisons between the poet’s ekphrastic poems vs. her
“unsigned works,” except to say they are both result from artistic
inspiration.
The poems in Jester are divided into four
sections, Improv, Impersonation, Singing the Blues and Last Act,
which are terms from performance art, and life. Jester, the book,
is also a life-form, and we can trace Jester’s development through
the Table of Contents, which is the tale of his life. Depicted
in 26 different poses on the cover, Jester develops his dramatic
skills in improv, perfecting his improv enough, presumably, to
write poems and get to his next period of development. Let’s follow
him as he moves from from the 1st Improv section to the 2nd section,
Impersonation, which Jester may find to be a more exacting art,
requiring more specialized skill. The majority of the non-ekphrastic
poems, which I’ve taken to calling “unsigned works” by the poet,
occur under Impersonation. So, here, we are being warned by the
poet, we need to be vigilant, for if we seek her, we may instead
find one of the 26 poses of Jester. Jester continues to develop,
and express himself in singing, and finally in Singing the Blues,
the third section. There are sad poems here which expresses the
transitory nature of beauty, which sings of its own demise. But
there are transformational poems too. In Singing the Blues we
have a very powerful poem, one of the poet’s “unsigned works”
called Transparent, (p.57) one of my favorites, in the book, which
I will save for the end. It expresses a Buddhist attitude of death,
rebirth and transformation. The final section is Last Act which
also contains poems on death and transformation. **
Because they reference other art works, ekphrastic
art often contains additional overlays of meaning and interpretation.
In this collection of poems, certain motifs from the life of poet,
especially as she grows up – dresses, hair, flowers, relations
with her mother, father and grandmother – appear in Jester. These
elements also figure prominently in other works by the poet. Indeed,
why should such leit motifs not appear in the collection, since
they are part of the poet’s experience? Perhaps, the poet authored
a book of ekphrastic poems to give her voice new referents, and
permit the old ones mentioned above, to continue to speak.
Irony, or reflective distance figures throughout
the poems that appear in Jester, as well as in her earlier poetry
collections, Other Clues and Whimsy, Reticence and Laud. The irony
is not mean-spirited or cynical. It is vivacious and playful,
even coyly seductive, in that the attention of the reader is drawn
to the different levels of meaning as it purveys the referenced
art work within the new poem. In Jester, while the particular
art works referenced are perhaps, likely to be unknown to the
reader, the artists are often famous. The poems sometimes describe
details of art works that are not visible to the readers, the
poet having a kind of privileged access to them, The resultant
images are private to the poet, but are spoken of in a public
way So, portions of some poems appear to be written in a kind
of private language, or the reader may feel like they are eavesdropping
on a private discussion between the poet and art work that has
inspired the poem. This can sometimes be frustrating to read.
At such times, the reader must take solace in Author’s Statement
at the beginning of the book, that her ekphrastic poems are inspired
by, or evoked by the art works, and are not imitative, or mimetic
poems. But if the art work remains veiled, the poem can become
all the more alluring, perhaps like covered vs. uncovered flesh.
A dialectic between concealing and revealing, and the known and
unknown may emerge, a dialectic at is simultaneously at work,
and at play.
There are others I could choose. However, I think
this is particularly fine poem in which one the various image-streams
move very well with each other, converging, yet keep their separateness,
as the poem proceeds – the image- streams of Pandora, the subject
of the poem, the readers own image of that famous mythological
figure, the narrative streams of the poet’s own life, the poem
itself, and the referenced art work.
Pandora
Swarmed, flash to the heart, she wants
to grab it back, wants to fan out with the forms:
be winged. And understands why she’s been
warned. Nothing would ever fit again.
Straight scattered into zigzag and myriad —
a fluvial harmony she’s only in dreams.
Her mother’s wishes, Father’s protection,
even her hiking boots and down vest,
she’ll have to beg for them now. Oh honey, honey
bending skin to dazzle. Fecundity a fragmented
architecture, her body filled with fluff and too
much
laughter. Shy, earth, animal legs, ears,
total voice, how can she hear them all,
now she’s dedicated to float and flow into
every interstice, all the wrinkles in the elephant’s
hide,
dedicated for the rest of her life to find, to find.
.........to Mary Frances Judge’s painting “Pandora”
Apart from interpreting art, it is often difficult
to describe to others, what one thinks or feels, in general. This
has been called the egocentric predicament, since we inhabit different
skins which necessarily tie us to our own egos, our subjectivity.
Artists, knowingly, or unknowingly, often draw from the unconscious.
Psychotherapists sometimes visit this realm too, viewing the unconscious
not just as the source of creativity, but the source of neurosis
or psychosis. Freud’s famous phase is that the purpose of psychoanalysis
is make the unconscious, conscious. A famous rejoinder to that
attitude, was made by the famous poet, Rilke. Rilke was asked,
in the early years of the 20th century, also the early years of
psychoanalysis, why he wouldn’t enter analysis. His reply, so
the story goes, was that if his demons left him, he was afraid
that his angels wouldn’t want to stay. In fact, a recent book
has been published(Freud’s Requiem by Matthew von Unwerth) on
an imagined summer walk and discussion among Rilke, Freud, and
Lou-Andreas Salome.
If we can pull these two approaches together, Rilke’s
point, to let the unconscious express itself through art, is different
than making the unconscious, conscious. Rilke point seems to be
that art can retain its numinous quality, and and its symbolism,
without being reduced to psychoanalytic descriptions of events
in the psyche. Certainly the poems in this collection gravitate
around the pole of Rilke’s attitude rather than that of Freud.
Yet, in the book, all sorts of attitudes and situations are given
voice, not necessarily the rational, self-aware voice of the poet,
but the voices of various aesthetic experiences that speak out
directly, in the poems.
At this point, three poems vie for attention for
a spot here. I can include only one, but I wish to acknowledge
two other poems, “As Might be Predicted,” an ekphrastic poem to
Roger Capron’s ceramic sculpture, and with its multiple images
of musical revelry, and her poem on an artist, “He Paints The
Sleep of Caliban” by Odilon Redon in which the poet describes
the painter painting his own dream inside the picture. The image-streams
of the poem that will appear now, are not as complex as in these
two other poems, but the meaning lies just below the surface,
in a way that I think might appeal to both Freud and Rilke. And
it is a lovely poem, sensuous, sensual with social commentary
as well.
I cannot ring a world quite round,
Although I patch it as I can
She lends him one long hair from the many on her
head.
Token to dispel what he things is his workday.
This is before everything turns grey and the river
is diverted into a viaduct that runs
between altered fields.
She understands the meaning of the mill
with its great grinding he must attend.
Life is no longer reverie. Still, she lends him
her long brown hair before it turns grey.
He tucks it under his shirt.
Before the day becomes a grind and he’s
covered by alteration’s veil.
To dispel the notion that dawn is a trap
to draw them into the viaduct at the place
where frogs are swept away.
At sunset he returns. She draw the long hair
from the sweat on his chest and leads him
by the length of it upriver, viaduct and mill left
behind,
into the smell of what men haven’t planted:
violets, mugwort, horsetail fern.
....... Title from poem by Wallace Stevens
**
Story-telling bursts Its bounds, when Jester is
viewed in the context of two earlier volumes of poems by the poet,
Other Clues (2010, composed of prose poems) and Whimsy,
Reticence and Laud (2012). This writer has had the pleasure
to review these two earlier works. The prose poems of Other Clues
are often phrases, images, or sentence fragments with a staccato
quality. Toward the end of Other Clues, the post writes and reflects
on art works, which the author Acknowledges at its beginning.
As in Jester, the poems tend to declamatory, and they share the
quality of being “performance art,” Play figures prominently in
them. By this, I mean that the poems are dramatic presentations
of the poet’s engagement with other things in her life or thoughts
that have conspired with each other, and inspired her to write
the poem. In other words, the declamatory elements express dialogue
among the subjects in the poem, the poet’s emotions and her recollections
from the past. Motifs from Jester — a young girl growing up, dress,
hair, flowers, her mother, her grandmother, life as she experiences
it— also are prominent in the two other collections. The works
are also serious and playful with irony figuring in to no small
degree. Inspiration vies with reflection, one observes what one
feels, and then one writes.
The Style of Jester is very much that of
Whimsy… —- expressive, reflective, and playful dialogues
between the poet and her subjects . There seem to be more image-streams
in Jester, even in the “unsigned poems” of the poet. One might
say that the very act of writing ekphastic poems, implies a heightened
sensitivity to what other artists express through their work.
So, Jester represents an expansion of the poet’s own artistic
field and vision. However, Other Clues, the poet’s 2010 collection
of prose poems, includes poems on artists and art work in the
final section, “The Inadvisable.” These include prose poems on
Kandinsky, Degas, the contemporary poet W.S. Merwin, and various
artist friends, whom the author Acknowledges in Other Clues. Works
by these artists and others, like Chagall, also enter into the
ekphrastic poems of Jester.
How might we compare these three collections of
poems? In earlier reviews, I described the poems in Other Clues
as delving into the structures of things as they are, outside
the perceiver, and Whimsy as more of an examination of the surfaces
of things, as they perceived. Infused by the energy of the art
works, the poems in Jester deal more with transformation – images
from the poet’s present and recollected consciousness merge with
the images evoked by the art works. These deepen the level of
interaction of the poet with her subjects, create even more play,
and sometimes more complexity for the reader to follow these different
strands as they form the poem, right before our eyes. The words
evoke and play with us, even as the poet plays with her words,
as the very title of the books suggest, Other Clues, Whimsy, Reticence
and Laud and Jester. As I’ve said, the greater fluency of imagery
in Jester, is sometimes challenging for readers who wish to tease
out the different image streams.
**
Truth, and irony live together as a couple, not
always happily. Irony which is the comic restatement of truth,
flirts with us, in all of these works. This is shown in the titles
and the striking and unique cover art of all three poetry collections
by Grace Marie Grafton. They all suggests a dynamic of discovery
and uncovering, finding a reality that lurks behind appearance.
And so, in Whimsy, Reticence and Laud, whose subtitle is ”Unruly
Sonnets” a young girl on the cover, sits, half undressed in a
bathtub, water running. But she is not really “there,” for she’s
“lost” in thought. Then, there is the cover of Other Clues, which
is my favorite cover. A young bride, dressed in a wedding dress
(also the subject of poems, in the book), stands in a field, her
head rests against a large mirror, besides her, which mirrors
her complete reflection. She stands, head to head, and body to
body with…herself. She gazes outward and upward, absorbed, not
in the image of self-reflection right there besides her, but like
the young woman from Whimsy, she is absorbed in her thoughts.
A doe, a stag and two fawns stand beside her, signifying perhaps,
fertility and future family. But the bride’s gaze is not on them,
she’s not consciously part of that family grouping, her attention
is elsewhere, upward and inward at the same time. Maybe the bride
is imagining a future life and a future poem. Maybe she’s imagining
the poem “Jostle” from the poet’s later work, Whimsy, with which
I ended my review of Whimsy, for Jostle is a mating dance poem
for all living beings. I’m going to include it here, because it
leads right into another beautiful poem, Transparent, from Jester,
which takes that mating dance energy beyond death, in to new life.
Indeed, among the 26 poses of Jester, the one pose we do not see,
is the Jester in death. We’ll end this piece with both poems.
First,
Jostle
The world is never still. Moving, shifting,
rising. Is it that the molecules life
is made of are lonely, must constantly
nudge their neighboring manifestation?
Contact, communication, ‘lectrical
charge. Or could it be, life is so in love
that molecules must kiss and hug and mate?
Water specks into drops into streams into
rivers. Matter gathering into palm fronds
or beetle’s green lacquered wings beating
night air to bits that bump the eyeball
of a watching puma who wants to change
its prey into itself. Even in death
bodies transform. Not to exist is still.
(p. 31 from Whimsy, Reticence & Laud- Unruly Sonnets)
**
Transparent
Trapped in the nub of day, the woman
admits the inertia that accompanies rain.
Is where the borrowing begins. She thinks,
“There’s no end, there’s been no end since birth.”
Rung after rung, we climbed the ladder
down into her present body,
each rung more unconscious,
as though an angel stroked, hummed and wept
as it cradled her descent.
She argued with the ange
l to release her from what she knew would be
echo, each lifetime’s fallible promise.
But now she wishes for the sudden flush
into forgetting that always signals the new.
Futility subsumed by infant heartbeat,
five fingers that tingle with uniqueness
in their grooves, their singular ability
to insure, again,an unequivocal touch
on the repeated incarnations of Earth.
Jester (a volume of selected poems) by Grace
Marie Grafton, Hip Pocket Press, 2013, Book Review & Analysis,
by Paul Dolinsky
Whimsy, Reticence and Laud: Unruly Sonnets
by Grace Marie Grafton
Review by Paul Dolinsky
Editor, The Golden Lantern
tumblngphlilopoet.tumblr.com
|